Chemically strengthened glass and manufacturing method thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to a chemically strengthened glass having a thickness t (mm), in which a first-order derivative CS x ′ of a stress value CS x  (MPa) is −4.7 or larger in a range of CS x ≥0 in a profile of the stress value CS x  (MPa), in which the stress value CS x  (MPa) is a function of depth×(μm) from a glass surface, and in which the stress value CS x  (MPa) is measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter, and a manufacturing method thereof.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a chemically strengthened glass and a manufacturing method thereof.

BACKGROUND ART

A chemically strengthened glass is used for cover glasses of portable terminals etc. The chemically strengthened glass is a glass in which a compressed stress layer is formed in a glass surface portion through ion exchange between alkali metal ions contained in the glass and alkali metal ions having a larger ion radius contained in a molten salt composition of by bringing a glass into contact with the molten salt composition such as sodium nitrate. The strength of the chemically strengthened glass depends on a stress profile represented by a compressive stress (hereinafter may be abbreviated as “CS”) with the depth from the glass surface as a variable.

The cover glasses of portable terminals etc. may be broken by deformation that occurs when, for example, they are dropped. To prevent such breaking, that is, breaking due to bending, it is effective to increase the compressing stress at the glass surface. To this end, in recent years, it has become common to produce surface compressive stress of 700 MPa or larger.

On the other hand, the cover glasses of portable terminals etc. may also be broken by collision with a protrusion when they are dropped onto an asphalt surface or grit. To prevent such breaking, that is, breaking due to impact, it is effective to increase its strength by forming a compressive stress layer to a deeper portion of the glass by increasing the compressive stress layer depth.

However, when the compressive stress layer is formed in a surface portion of a glass article, tensile stress (hereinafter may be abbreviated as “CT”) necessarily occurs in a core portion of the glass article according to the total amount of compressive stress in the surface layer. If this tensile stress value is too large, a glass article is broken violently to scatter fragments. If CT exceeds a threshold value (hereinafter referred to as a “CT limit”), the number of fragments at the time of breaking starts to increase explosively.

Thus, in a chemically strengthened glass, whereas a compressive stress layer is formed to a deeper portion by setting the surface compressive stress large, the total amount of compressive stress in a surface layer is determined so that CT does not exceed a CT limit. For example, Patent document 1 discloses a chemically strengthened glass in which CT is controlled so as to fall within a particular range.

[Patent document 1] JP-T-2017-523110 (The symbol “JP-T” as used herein means a published Japanese translation of a PCT patent application.)

As described above, a chemically strengthened glass is desired in which a compressive stress layer is formed while the tensile stress CT is made smaller than a CT limit and that is excellent in drop strength as to be able to suppress breaking when subjected to impact.

An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a chemically strengthened glass that is excellent in drop strength and hence can suppress breaking when subjected to impact, as well as a manufacturing method thereof.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present inventors studied the above problems and have found that a chemically strengthened glass can be obtained in which the compressive stress in a glass deep layer that is effective in increasing the impact resistance at the time of dropping is controlled to a prescribed level or higher while the compressive stress at the glass surface is lowered, by adding a small amount of lithium ions to a molten salt composition that is used in the second-stage chemical strengthening of two-step chemical strengthening for lithium-containing glass. The inventors have found that the above object can be attained by such chemically strengthened glass and thereby completed the invention.

The present invention relates to a chemically strengthened glass having a thickness t (mm), in which a first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of a stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is −4.7 or larger in a range of CS_(x)≥0 in a profile of the stress value CS_(x) (MPa), in which the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is a function of depth×(μm) from a glass surface, and in which the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter.

The present invention relates to a manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method including:

performing a first ion exchange by immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition containing sodium ions; and

performing a second ion exchange by immersing the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange in a second molten salt composition containing potassium ions and lithium ions, in which:

a concentration of a sodium nitrate in the first molten salt composition is higher than 50 mass %; and

in the second molten salt composition a concentration of a potassium nitrate is 85 mass % or higher and a ratio of a mass of sodium ions to a mass of lithium ions represented by a mass ratio of (sodium ions)/(lithium ions) is 0 or larger and 15 or smaller.

The present invention relates to a manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method including:

performing a first ion exchange by immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition containing sodium ions; and

performing a second ion exchange by immersing the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange in a second molten salt composition containing potassium ions and lithium ions, in which:

the lithium-containing glass is chemically strengthened so that a maximum tensile stress CT₂ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the second ion exchange becomes 50% to 99% of a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange.

The present invention relates to a manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method including:

a first step of immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition; and

a second step of immersing the lithium-containing glass in a second molten salt composition that is different in composition from the first molten salt composition, in which:

an ion exchange for giving a stress that is larger than a CT limit to the lithium-containing glass is performed in the first step; and

a step of reducing the stress to a value lower than the CT limit is executed in the second step.

The present invention relates to a chemically strengthened glass, in which:

a base composition includes, as represented by mol % based on oxides,

SiO₂ of 40% to 75%;

Al₂O₃ of 1% to 20%; and

Li₂O of 5% to 35%; and

in which a stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 (μm) from a glass surface satisfies the following inequality:

CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t≥2.0

where t (mm) is a thickness of the chemically strengthened glass, CT₂ (MPa) is maximum tensile stress and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth.

The chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention exhibits high drop strength because it is given a particular stress profile and hence its tensile stress CT is made smaller than a CT limit.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a graph showing an example stress profile of the stress value CS_(x) of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention.

FIG. 1B is a graph showing an absolute value of a first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of the stress profile of the stress value CS_(x).

FIG. 1C is a graph showing a second-order derivative CS_(x)″ of the stress profile of the stress profile of the stress value CS_(x).

FIG. 2 shows comparison between an example CS_(x) stress profile of chemically strengthened glass according to the invention and an example CS_(x) stress profile of chemically strengthened glass manufactured by the conventional two-step chemical strengthening.

FIGS. 3A-3P show profiles of stress values CS_(x) of Examples.

FIGS. 4A-4P show the absolute values of first-order derivatives CS_(x)′ of CS_(x) stress profile of Examples.

FIGS. 5A-5P show second-order derivatives CS_(x)″ of CS_(x) stress profile of Examples.

FIG. 6 shows results of drop strength tests of Examples.

FIGS. 7A-7F show combined stress profiles of surface layers of Examples.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS <Stress Measuring Method>

In recent years, glass manufactured by two-step chemical strengthening in which lithium ions in glass are replaced with sodium ions (Li—Na exchange) and then sodium ions in the glass are replaced with potassium ions (Na—K exchange) in a glass surface layer has become the mainstream glass for cover glasses of smartphones etc.

A stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass manufactured by such two-step chemical strengthening is acquired nondestructively by, for example, using a scattered light photoelastic stress meter (hereinafter may be abbreviated as “SLP”) and a film stress measurement meter (hereinafter may be abbreviated as FSM) in combination.

A method using a scattered light photoelastic stress meter (SLP) can measure compressive stress originating from Li—Na exchange in a glass deep portion that is distant from the glass surface by several tens of micrometers or more. On the other hand, a method using a film stress measurement meter (FSM) can measure compressive stress originating from Na—K exchange in a glass surface layer that is distant from the glass surface by several tens of micrometers or less (refer to WO 2018/056121 and WO 2017/115811, for example). Thus, a stress profile obtained by combining information obtained by an SLP and information obtained by an FSM may be used as a stress profile, including a surface layer profile and a deep portion profile, of chemically strengthened glass manufactured by the two-step chemical strengthening.

On the other hand, the present invention employs a stress profile measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter (SLP) is mainly used for studying influence of sodium ions that are introduced by ion exchange. In the present specification, a stress profile measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter (SLP) is referred to as an “SLP stress profile” or merely as a “stress profile” and is discriminated from a stress profile obtained by combining information obtained by an SLP and information obtained by an FSM which is referred to as, for example, a “combined profile.” Furthermore, terms “stress value CS_(x)”, “tensile stress value CT”, and “compressive stress depth DOL” etc. mean values in an SLP stress profile.

The scattered light photoelastic stress meter is a stress measuring device including: a polarization phase difference variable member configured to vary a polarization phase difference of a laser light by one wavelength of the laser light or more; an imaging element to image a plurality of times at a predetermined time interval a scattered light emitted according to the laser light with the varied polarization phase difference entering the strengthened glass, and obtain a plurality of images; and an arithmetic unit configured to measure a periodic change in luminance of the scattered light using the plurality of images, calculate a change in a phase of the change in luminance, and calculate a stress distribution in a depth direction from a surface of the strengthened glass based on the change in the phase.

An example method for measuring a stress profile using a scattered light photoelastic stress meter is a method disclosed in WO 2018/056121. Examples of scattered light photoelastic stress meters are SLP-1000 and SLP-2000 manufactured by Orihara Industrial Co., Ltd. A highly accurate stress measurement can be performed by combining each of these scattered light photoelastic stress meters with software SlpIV (ver. 2019.01.10.001) attached to it.

<Stress Profile>

A stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass according to the invention is measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter as described above and is characterized in that the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of stress value CS_(x) (MPa) at a depth of x (μm) from the glass surface is −4.7 or larger in a range of CS_(x)≥0.

FIG. 1A shows an example stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention. FIG. 1B shows an absolute value of a first-order derivative of the stress profile shown in FIG. 1A. FIG. 1C shows a second-order derivative of the stress profile shown in FIG. 1A. As shown in FIG. 1A, the stress value CS_(x) varies depending on the depth x from the glass surface. The graph shown in FIG. 1B is a graph of CS_(x)′ obtained by differentiating CS_(x) with respect to x and is plotted in terms of absolute values to make it easier to see.

As shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, in the present invention, the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of stress value CS_(x) is −4.7 or larger in a range of CS_(x)≥0. That is, this stress profile has a feature that the rate of stress decrease in a compressive stress layer is small.

As described later, in the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention having the above-shaped stress profile, the resistance to fracture due to drop impact is made higher than in chemically strengthened glass manufactured by conventional two-step chemical strengthening by increasing a stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 μm. Furthermore, since the sum of compressive stress values in a compressive stress layer can be made smaller, stress values in a tensile stress layer that depend on the sum of compressive stress values in the compressive stress layer can be reduced and tensile stress CT can be made smaller than a CT limit.

A stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 μm is a parameter that contributes to increase the resistance to fracture due to drop impact. When a glass article is dropped onto an asphalt-paved road or grit, a crack may develop due to collision with a protrusion such as a grit object. Whereas the length of the crack depends on the size of the protrusion, the glass article can be prevented from breaking into fragments even when it collides with a relatively large protrusion if a compressive stress value CS₉₀ (MPa) at a depth of 90 μm from the glass surface is set large, in which case a stress profile having a large compressive stress portion around the depth 90 μm, for example, is formed.

In the present specification, the term “CT limit” means a maximum tensile stress CT value at a boundary where the number of fragments changes from 10 or less to 10 or more in a number-of-fragments test that will be described later in Examples. The CT limit is a value that depends on the kind of glass and is determined experimentally and relates to the thickness and a compressive stress depth DOL of glass.

A stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention is formed by, for example, two-step chemical strengthening. In first-stage chemical strengthening, glass is immersed in a molten salt containing sodium ions, thereby “Li—Na exchange” in which lithium ions in the glass are mainly replaced with sodium ions in the molten salt occurs. In the first-stage chemical strengthening, the molten salt may contain lithium ions or potassium ions. In the case where the molten salt contains potassium ions, “Na—K exchange” in which sodium ions in the glass are replaced with potassium ions in the molten salt occurs. As a result, compressive stress is produced at such a level that the tensile stress CT exceeds a CT limit. In the case where the molten salt contains lithium ions, “Na—Li exchange” in which sodium ions in the glass are replaced with lithium ions in the molten salt occurs, whereby a stress value CS at the glass surface is reduced. As a result, a compressive stress depth DOL can be larger, even though the chemically strengthened glass has the tensile stress CT according to the CT limit.

In the subsequent second-stage chemical strengthening, a molten salt obtained by adding a small amount of lithium ions to a molten salt containing potassium ions is used. While sodium ions in the glass are replaced with potassium ions in the molten salt (Na—K exchange), sodium ions in a glass surface layer is decreased by replacement of sodium ions in the glass with lithium ions in the molten salt (Li—Na exchange). With this treatment, only stress produced in a surface layer is reduced to a proper level and the tensile stress CT can be made smaller than the CT limit while a stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 μm is maintained.

FIG. 2 shows comparison between an example stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention (Example 3) and an example stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass manufactured by the conventional two-step chemical strengthening (Example 16). As shown in FIG. 2, in the stress profile of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, compressive stress produced in a surface layer is reduced and the tensile stress CT exceeds a CT limit can be avoided while a stress value CS₉₀ is increased.

As described above, in the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, since the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of stress value CS_(x) satisfies the relationship CS_(x)′≥−4.7 in a range of CS_(x)≥0, the rate of decrease of a stress profile from a value at the surface is made small. As a result, the tensile stress CT can be made smaller than the CT limit while a stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 μm is increased to increase the resistance to fracture due to drop impact. The present invention will be described in detail below.

Embodiment of Chemically Strengthened Glass Stress Profile in Embodiment

As described above, the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention is characterized in that the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is −4.7 or larger in the profile of the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) at the depth of x (μm) from the glass surface measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter. The first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of the stress value CS_(x) is preferably −3.5 or larger, more preferably −3.0 or larger, further more preferably −2.6 or larger, and even further more preferably −1.9 or larger. In the case where the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ is in the above range, the rate of decrease of the stress profile is small, whereby stress values in a glass deep layer can be increased easily. For example, in the case where a compressive stress value CS₀ at the glass outermost surface is kept the same, larger CS_(x)′ provides an effect of keeping CS₉₀ large. The CS_(x)′ is preferably 0 or smaller, more preferably −0.3 or smaller, further more preferably −0.5 or smaller, and even further more preferably −0.8 or smaller.

FIG. 1C shows a second-order derivative CS_(x)″ of the stress value CS_(x). The CS_(x)″ is preferably 0.050 or smaller, even more preferably 0.035 or smaller, further more preferably 0.023 or smaller, even further more preferably 0.016 or smaller, and particularly preferably 0.010 or smaller. In the case where the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ is in the above range, the CS_(x)″ comes closer to a straight line and the stress value CS₉₀ at the depth 90 μm can be increased more effectively. The CS_(x)″ may have a value 0, that is, the stress profile may have an inflection point. With a stress profile having an inflection point in a deep layer, the tensile stress CT can be made particularly small and hence such a stress profile is preferable from the viewpoint that CT can easily be made smaller than a CT limit. On the other hand, the stress profile may be such that CS_(x)″ is positive and has no inflection point. Having no local stress reduction, a stress profile having no inflection point is preferable in that development of a crack originating from a glass surface layer can be prevented.

As for a method for differentiating stress profile, as is understood from the following equation, rates of change of CS_(x) for a 0.5 μm variation of x are employed as CS_(x)′ values and rates of change of CS_(x)′ for a 0.5 μm variation of x are employed as CS_(x)″ values:

CS_(x)′=(CS_(x+0.5)−CS_(x))/0.5

CS_(x)″=(CS_(x+0.5)′−CS_(x)′)/0.5.

In chemically strengthened glass having a thickness t (mm) according to the present invention, it is preferable that CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t is 1.62 or larger, where CT₂ is a maximum tensile stress value (MPa) and DOL is a compressive stress layer depth (μm), more preferably 1.72 or larger, further more preferably 2.00 or larger, and even further more preferably 2.50 or larger.

There are physical phenomena that CS₉₀ increases with the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ and, on the other hand, the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ increases as the thickness t decreases. For generalization with elimination of influences of the thickness t, as described above, comparison is made using values of the above formula CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t. The chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention can increase the drop strength if CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t is 1.62 or larger.

In chemically strengthened glass having a thickness t (mm) according to the present invention, it is preferable that a maximum tensile stress value CT₂ (MPa) measured by the scattered light photoelastic stress meter be19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or smaller. In the case where the thickness is t (mm) and the value of CT₂ (MPa) is 19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or smaller, CT₂ is made a CT limit or smaller and occurrence of violent fracture can be suppressed. Since a CT limit is determined by a thickness t of chemically strengthened glass and a compressive stress depth DOL, the above value, for example, can be used as a replacement value for a CT limit instead of determining a CT limit by a number-of fragments test to be described in Examples.

On the other hand, it is preferable that a maximum tensile stress value CT₂ (MPa) as measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter be15/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or larger. In the case where CT₂ (MPa) is 15/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or larger, sufficiently large compressive stress can be introduced according to a compressive stress layer to increase the strength.

In the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, a compressive stress value CS₀ at the glass outermost surface as measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter is preferably 300 MPa or smaller, more preferably 275 MPa or smaller, further more preferably 245 MPa or smaller, and even further more preferably 200 MPa or smaller. In the case where CS₀ is 300 MPa or smaller, the total amount of stress in a compressive stress layer can be decreased, a maximum tensile stress CT₂ can be reduced so as to be smaller than a CT limit.

In the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, where its thickness is t (mm), the compressive stress depth DOL (μm) is preferably larger than (100 t+30), even more preferably (100 t+40) or larger, further more preferably (100 t+45) or larger, even further more preferably (100 t+50) or larger. In the case where the thickness is t (mm) and the compressive stress depth DOL is larger than (100 t+30), compressive stress is introduced to a deep portion in the glass thickness direction, which is advantageous to preventing fracture due to impact. On the other hand, to balance the total amount of the compressive stress and the tensile stress in the glass thickness direction, where the thickness is t (mm), the DOL (m) is preferably (100 t+90) or smaller, more preferably (100 t+85) or smaller, and further more preferably (100 t+80) or smaller.

(Base Composition of Chemically Strengthened Glass)

The base composition of the chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention coincides with the composition of glass before being subjected to chemical strengthening, which is described later. The base composition is a composition of a portion in such a region as not to be influenced by ion exchange, and is a composition of portion that is deeper than a compressive stress depth DOL of the chemically strengthened glass except for a case that it has been subjected to extreme ion exchange treatment.

<Embodiment of Manufacturing Method of Chemically Strengthened Glass>

The chemically strengthening treatment is treatment of replacing metal ions having a small ion radius (typically, lithium ions or sodium ions) in glass with metal ions having a large ion radius (typically, sodium ions or potassium ions for lithium ions and potassium ions for sodium ions) in the metal salt by, for example, a method of immersing glass in a melt of a metal salt (e.g., sodium nitrate or potassium nitrate) containing metal ions having a large ion radius (typically, sodium ions or potassium ions).

A manufacturing method for chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention has the following features:

(Process 1) First ion exchange is performed by immersing lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition in which the concentration of sodium nitrate is higher than 50 mass %.

(Process 2) Second ion exchange is performed by immersing the lithium-containing glass after the first ion exchange in a second molten salt composition in which the ratio of a mass of sodium ions to a mass of lithium ions represented by the mass ratio of (sodium ions/lithium ions) is 0 or larger and 15 or smaller.

Each of these processes will be described below in detail.

(Process 1) First Ion Exchange Process

In the first process of the manufacturing method of chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, first ion exchange is performed by immersing lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition containing sodium ions. The details of lithium-containing glass to be subjected to chemical strengthening will be described later in detail.

In Process 1, sodium ions are introduced to a glass deep layer by “Li—Na exchange” in which lithium ions in the glass are exchanged with sodium ions in the molten salt, whereby a deep compressive stress layer can be formed.

The term “molten salt composition” means a composition containing a molten salt. Examples of a molten salt contained in a molten salt composition include a nitrate salt, a sulfate salt, a carbonate salt, and a chloride salt. Examples of nitrate salt include lithium nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, cerium nitrate, rubidium nitrate, and silver nitrate. Examples of sulfate salt include lithium sulfate, sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, cesium sulfate, rubidium sulfate, and silver sulfate. Examples of chloride include lithium chloride, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, cesium chloride, rubidium chloride, and silver chloride. These molten salts may be used either singly or in a combination of plural kinds.

The molten salt composition is preferably a composition having a nitrate salt as a base component, more preferably a composition having sodium nitrate or potassium nitrate as a base component. The expression “as a base component” means that the content of the salt in the molten salt composition is 80 mass % or higher.

In first ion exchange, the content of sodium nitrate in the first molten salt composition is higher than 50 mass %. In the first embodiment, the content of sodium nitrate in the first molten salt composition may be 65 mass % or higher, 75 mass % or higher, 85 mass % or higher, or 95 mass % or higher. In the case where the content of sodium nitrate is in the above range, amount of sodium ions which are introduced into a glass deep layer becomes to be large by “Li—Na exchange,” whereby an effect of increasing CS₉₀ is obtained.

On the other hand, in the case where potassium nitrate is added in the first molten salt composition, the content of potassium nitrate may be 35% or lower, 25 mass % or lower, 15% or lower, or 5% or lower. In the case where the content of potassium nitrate is in the above range, a sufficient amount of sodium ions can be introduced into a glass deep layer because “Li—Na exchange” works dominantly over “Na—K exchange.”

It is preferable that a maximum tensile stress value CT₁ of a stress profile that is formed inside the glass by the first ion exchange is larger than a CT limit. In the case where the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ obtained after the first ion exchange is larger than the CT limit, a sufficiently large compressive stress is produced by the first ion exchange and CS₉₀ can be kept large even after stress values in a glass surface layer are lowered by the subsequent second ion exchange process.

More preferably, ion exchange is performed so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange becomes larger than 17.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000). That is, a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange preferably satisfies CT₁>17.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000), where t is a thickness of a the chemically strengthened glass and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth. In the case where the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ is larger than 17.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000), compressive stress can be introduced so that CT₁ exceeds a CT limit.

In Process 1, the lithium-containing glass is preferably immersed in the first molten salt composition whose temperature is 360° C. or higher. In the case where the temperature of the first molten salt composition is 360° C. or higher, the ion exchange proceeds easily and compressive stress can be introduced in such a range that CT₁ exceeds the CT limit. The temperature of the first molten salt composition is more preferably 380° C. or higher and further more preferably 400° C. or higher. From the viewpoints of occurrence of danger and variation of the composition of the first molten salt composition caused by evaporation, the temperature of the first molten salt composition is usually set at 450° C. or lower.

From the viewpoint of increasing the surface compressive stress, it is preferable that the time for which the lithium-containing glass is immersed in the first molten salt composition is 0.5 hour or longer, more preferably 1 hour or longer. If the immersion time is too long, not only the productivity lowers but also the compressive stress may lower due to a relaxation phenomenon. Thus, the immersion time is usually set at 12 hours or shorter.

(Process 2) Second Ion Exchange Process

Process 2 is a process of performing second ion exchange by immersing glass subjected to the first ion exchange process in Process 1 in a second molten salt composition that has potassium nitrate as a base component and contains a small amount of lithium ions.

In the second ion exchange, “Na—K exchange” in which sodium ions in the glass are replaced with potassium ions occurs, whereby potassium ions are introduced into a glass surface layer having a thickness of several tens of micrometers. At the same time, the amount of sodium ions in a glass surface layer is lowered by “Na—Li exchange,” whereby the compressive stress produced by sodium ions is reduced. In the second ion exchange, the compressive stress in the chemically strengthened glass is reduced while CS₉₀ is maintained and it is adjusted so that CT₂ becomes smaller than the CT limit. Incidentally, a stress profile measured by an SLP does not reflect influence of stress in the glass surface layer in which potassium ions have been introduced. Thus, tensile stress reduction caused by the decrease of sodium ions can be checked using a stress profile measured by an SLP.

The concentration of potassium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is preferably 85 mass % or higher, more preferably 90 mass % or higher, and further more preferably 95 mass % or higher. Although there are no particular limitations on the upper limit, the concentration of potassium nitrate is usually 99.9 mass % or lower. Furthermore, the ratio of the mass of sodium ions to a mass of lithium ions represented by a mass ratio of (sodium ions)/(lithium ions) in the second molten salt composition is preferably 0 or larger and 15 or smaller. The mass ratio of (sodium ions)/(lithium ions) being in the above range means that a lithium salt such as lithium nitrate is added to the second molten salt composition intentionally.

In the case where, for example, sodium nitrate is added to the second molten salt composition, lithium ions in the glass are replaced with sodium ions in the second molten salt composition (Li—Na exchange), whereby lithium ions are mixed into the second molten salt composition. The amount of lithium ions that are mixed into the second molten salt composition at this time increases according to the amount of sodium ions contained in the second molten salt composition.

On the other hand, the replacement of sodium ions in the glass with lithium ions mixed in the second molten salt composition (Na—Li exchange) is suppressed by the sodium ions in the second molten salt composition. Thus, the compressive stress that was produced in the glass surface layer in Process 1 can be weakened by effectively causing the replacement of sodium ions in the glass with lithium ions in the second molten salt composition (Na—Li exchange) by adding lithium ions in the second molten salt composition intentionally by an amount that is larger than or equal to an amount of sodium ions mixed in it by addition of sodium nitrate.

It is preferable that the second molten salt composition contain lithium nitrate of 0.1 mass % or higher and 10 mass % or lower. In the case where the second molten salt composition contains lithium nitrate in this range, replacement of sodium ions introduced in the vicinity of the glass surface in Process 1 with lithium ions in the second molten salt composition occurs parallel with replacement of those sodium ions with potassium ions in the second molten salt composition, whereby the compressive stress in a glass surface layer can be weakened. The content of lithium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is more preferably 0.3 mass % or higher and 5 mass % or lower and further more preferably 0.5 mass % or higher and 2.5 mass % or lower.

The second molten salt composition may contain sodium nitrate. In the case where the second molten salt composition contains sodium nitrate, the concentration of sodium nitrate is preferably higher than 0.1 mass % and more preferably 0.5 mass % or higher. In the case where the concentration of sodium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is in the above range, the effect of increasing CS₉₀ is enhanced. The presence of sodium ions in the second molten salt composition causes Li—Na exchange to proceed also in the second ion exchange, whereby CS₉₀ is increased. Furthermore, in the case where the concentration of sodium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is in the above range, the period when the effect of the present invention is demonstrated can be elongated without replacing the second molten salt composition, whereby the amount of glass processed can be increased. The concentration of sodium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is preferably 5 mass % or lower, more preferably 3 mass % or lower, further more preferably 2 mass % or lower, and most preferably 1 mass % or lower. Setting the concentration of sodium nitrate in the above range makes it easier to suppress the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ within the CT limit.

The second molten salt composition may further contain an additive other than nitrate salts. Examples of additive include a silicic acid and a particular inorganic salt. In the case where the second molten salt composition contains an additive, CS₀ in a combined profile of FSM and SLP can be increased. A detailed description will be made below.

The second molten salt composition may contain a silicic acid as an additive. The silicic acid is a compound that consists of silicon atoms, hydrogen atoms, and oxygen atoms and is expressed by a chemical formula nSiO₂.xH₂O, where n and x are natural numbers. Examples of silicic acid include metasilicic acid (SiO₂.H₂O), di silicic acid (2SiO₂.H₂O), orthosilicic acid (SiO₂.2H₂O), pyrosilicic acid (2SiO₂.3H₂O), and silica gel (SiO₂.mH₂O, m is a real number of 0.1 to 1).

In the case where a silicic acid is contained, since the silicic acid absorbs a lithium ion to facilitate potassium ions to enter the glass, the stress in a surface layer having a thickness of several micrometers in the combined profile of FSM and SLP can be increased while CT is suppressed. Since lithium ions react with sodium ions through “Na—Li exchange,” the progress of “Na—K exchange” can be suppressed. Thus, the addition of a silicic acid is effective in accelerating “Na—K exchange.”

The addition amount of the silicic acid is preferably 0.1 mass % or larger, more preferably 0.3 mass % or larger, and most preferably 0.5 mass % or larger. On the other hand, the addition amount of the silicic acid is preferably 3 mass % or smaller, more preferably 2 mass % or smaller, and most preferably 1 mass % or smaller. In the case where the addition amount of the silicic acid is in the above range, the surface layer stress in an SLP stress profile can be reduced meaningfully by “Na—Li exchange.” That is, the effects of a rise of compressive stress in a surface layer having a thickness of several micrometers in the combined profile by introduction of potassium ions and reduction of stress in a layer to DOL in an SLP profile through decrease of sodium ions can be obtained.

It is preferable that the silicic acid is silica gel (SiO₂.mH₂O, m is a real number of 0.1 to 1). Since silica gel has relatively large size of secondary particles, silica gel is easily sedimented in a molten salt and hence has an advantage that it can be input and collected easily. Since silica gel do not swirl as particles, silica gel can secure safety of workers. Furthermore, since silica gel has a porous body, a molten salt tends to be supplied to the surfaces of primary particles, silica gel is superior in reactivity and exhibits a great effect of absorbing lithium ions.

The second molten salt composition may contain a particular inorganic substance (hereinafter referred to as flux) as an additive. The flux is preferably a carbonate salt, a hydrogen carbonate salt, a phosphate salt, a sulfate salt, a hydroxide, and a chloride. It is more preferable that the second molten salt composition contain at least one selected from the group consisting of K₂CO₃, Na₂CO₃, KHCO₃, NaHCO₃, K₃PO₄, Na₃PO₄, K₂SO₄, Na₂SO₄, KOH, NaOH, KCl, and NaCl. It is further more preferable that the second molten salt composition contain at least one kind selected from the group consisting of K₂CO₃ and Na₂CO₃. It is particularly preferable that the second molten salt composition contain K₂CO₃.

Whereas lithium ions in the second molten salt composition can weaken compressive stress originating from sodium ions in the glass through “Na—Li” exchange, they may obstruct “Na—K exchange.” If “Na—K exchange” is impaired, it becomes difficult to obtain the effect of increasing CS₀ in the combined profile by introducing potassium ions in a glass surface layer. In the second molten salt composition, the mutual energy with an anion generated from flux increases in order of a potassium ion, a sodium ion, and a lithium ion. In the case where the second molten salt composition contains flux, since anions generated from the flux attract lithium ions, the phenomenon that lithium ions impair “Na—K exchange” can be suppressed, allowing potassium ions to be introduced into the glass easily. On the other hand, since anions generated from flux do not suppress “Na—Li exchange”, the stress originating from sodium ions in the glass can be weakened. As a result, the effect of increasing CS₀ in the combined profile can be obtained while the effect of weakening the compressive stress in a layer from the surface to DOL in an SLP profile is maintained. Among anions, a carbonate salt is preferable because it is high in the effect of attracting a lithium ion and hence is particularly high in the effect of increasing CS₀ in the combined profile.

The content of a carbonate salt is preferably 0.1 mass % or higher, in which case the effect of increasing CS₀ can be obtained easily. On the other hand, to suppress variation of the properties of the glass surface, that the content of a carbonate salt is preferably 2 mass % or lower and more preferably 1 mass % or lower.

It is preferable that the second molten salt composition contain one of a silicic acid and a carbonate salt. It is more preferable that the second molten salt composition contain both of a silicic acid and a carbonate salt because in that case the effect of increasing CS₀ can be obtained particularly easily.

It is preferable that in Process 2 lithium-containing glass be immersed in the second molten salt composition whose temperature is 360° C. or higher. When the temperature of the second molten salt composition is 360° C. or higher, ion exchange proceeds easily. The temperature of the second molten salt composition is more preferably 380° C. or higher and further more preferably 400° C. or higher. From the viewpoint of occurrence of danger and variation of composition of the second molten salt composition caused by evaporation, the temperature of the second molten salt composition is usually set at 450° C. or lower. From the viewpoint of preventing excessive stress decrease due to “Na—Li” exchange, the temperature of the second molten salt composition is more preferably 435° C. or lower.

In Process 2, the time in which lithium-containing glass is immersed in the second molten salt composition is preferably 0.1 hour or longer, in which case sodium ions that were introduced into a layer close to the glass surface in Process 1 are replaced sufficiently with lithium ions in the second molten salt composition and hence the stress at the glass surface can be weakened easily. The immersion time is more preferably 0.5 hour or longer and further more preferably 0.75 hour or longer. From the viewpoint of preventing excessive stress decrease by “Na—Li exchange”, the immersion time is preferably 3 hours or shorter.

It is preferable that the time t2 (min) in which the lithium-containing glass is immersed in the second molten salt composition whose temperature is at T (° C.) satisfy the following inequality, in which case the stress at the glass surface can be weakened to a proper value:

−0.38 T+173<t2<−1.4 T+720.

The time t2 (min) is preferably longer than (−0.38 T+173), more preferably (−0.36 T+167) or longer, and further more preferably (−0.35 T+167) or longer. On the other hand, the time t2 (min) is preferably shorter than (−1.4 T+720), more preferably (−1.3 T+670), and further more preferably (−1.2 T+620).

In Process 2, it is preferable to adjust the temperature of the second molten salt composition in which lithium-containing glass is to be immersed and the immersion time. More specifically, if the temperature of the second molten salt composition in which lithium containing glass is to be immersed is 380° C., the immersion time is preferably 30 minutes or longer and 180 minutes or shorter. If the temperature of the second molten salt composition in which lithium-containing glass is to be immersed is 400° C., the immersion time is preferably 20 minutes or longer and 150 minutes or shorter. If the temperature of the second molten salt composition in which lithium-containing glass is to be immersed is 420° C., the immersion time is preferably 10 minutes or longer and 120 minutes or shorter. If the temperature of the second molten salt composition in which lithium-containing glass is to be immersed is higher than 420° C., the immersion time is preferably 100 minutes or shorter.

As described above, it is preferable that the second ion exchange be performed so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the second ion exchange becomes the CT limit or smaller.

Furthermore, the chemical strengthening is preferably performed so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the second ion exchange becomes 50% to 99% of the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange, more preferably 60% or larger, further more preferably 75% or larger, and even further more preferably 80% or larger.

It is more preferable that the chemical strengthening be performed so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ (MPa) after the second ion exchange is 19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or smaller, where t is the thickness of the chemically strengthened glass and DOL is the depth (μm) of a compressive stress layer.

(Third and Subsequent Ion Exchange Processes)

In the manufacturing method according to the present invention, a plurality time of ion exchange processes may further be executed before and after Process 2. For example, in the case where third ion exchange is performed after Process 2, it is preferable to perform chemical strengthening at 380° C. to 420° C. for 5 to 30 minutes using a molten salt composition containing potassium nitrate of 95 mass % or higher. In this case, the concentration of potassium nitrate is preferably 95 mass % or higher, more preferably 97 mass % or higher, and further more preferably 99 mass % or higher. Such third ion exchange provides an effect of increasing the compressive stress at the outermost surface in a combined profile.

(Lithium-Containing Glass)

In the manufacturing method of chemically strengthened glass according to the present invention, chemical strengthening is performed on lithium-containing glass. In the present invention, the glass for chemical strengthening is preferably lithium aluminosilicate glass and may be crystallized glass or amorphous glass. In the present invention, the base composition of the chemically strengthened glass coincides with the composition of the glass for chemical strengthening. In the case where the glass for chemical strengthening is crystallized glass, resulting chemically strengthened glass is also crystallized glass.

More specifically, as for the composition of lithium-containing glass, it is preferable that lithium-containing glass be lithium aluminosilicate glass containing, as represented by mol % based on oxides of oxides,

SiO₂ of 52% to 75%;

Al₂O₃ of 8% to 20%; and

Li₂O of 5% to 16%.

More specifically, as for the composition of lithium-containing glass, it is preferable that lithium-containing glass be lithium aluminosilicate glass containing, as represented by mol % based on oxides of oxides,

SiO₂ of 40% to 75%;

Al₂O₃ of 1% to 20%; and

Li₂O of 5% to 35%.

In the present specification, the symbol “-” (or the word “to”) is used to express a numerical range including the numerical values written before and after it as a lower limit value and an upper limit value, respectively, unless otherwise specified.

In the present specification, a glass composition is described in mol % based on oxides and mol % may be written simply as “%” unless otherwise specified. The expression “substantially not contains” means that the substance in a raw material or the like is lower than or equal to an impurity level, that is, the substance is not contained intentionally. More specifically, for example, the content of the substance is lower than 0.1%.

Preferable glass compositions will be hereinafter described.

SiO₂ is a component that constitutes a framework of glass. SiO₂ is also a component that increases chemical durability and lowers the probability of development of cracks when a glass surface is scratched.

The content of SiO₂ is preferably 40% or higher, more preferably 55% or higher, and particularly preferably 65% or higher. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of increasing the meltability, the content of SiO₂ is preferably 75% or lower, more preferably 72% or lower, further more preferably 70% or lower, and particularly preferably 68% or lower.

Al₂O₃ is a component that is effective from the viewpoints of improving the ion exchange performance at the time of chemical strengthening and increasing the surface compressive stress obtained after the strengthening.

The content of Al₂O₃ is preferably 1% or higher, more preferably 6% or higher, further more preferably 9% or higher, and particularly preferably 11% or higher. Typically, the Al₂O₃ content is 12% or higher. On the other hand, if the content of Al₂O₃ is too high, crystals grow easily while materials are in a molten state and the production yield is prone to lower due to devitrification defects. Furthermore, the glass viscosity increases to lower the meltability. The content of Al₂O₃ is preferably 20% or lower, more preferably 19% or lower, and further more preferably 18% or lower.

SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ are both a component that stabilizes the glass structure. To lower the brittleness, the total content of SiO₂ and Al₂O₃ is preferably 65% or higher, more preferably 70% or higher, and further more preferably 75% or higher.

Li₂O is a component for producing surface compressive stress by ion exchange as well as a component for increasing the glass meltability. In the case where the glass for chemical strengthening contains Li₂O, a stress profile can be obtained in which the surface compressive stress is large and a compressive stress layer is thick by the method of replacing lithium ions in a glass surface layer with sodium ions and, furthermore, replacing sodium ions with potassium ions. From the viewpoint of facilitating formation of a preferable stress profile, the content of Li₂O is preferably 5% or higher, more preferably 7% or higher, further more preferably 9% or higher, particularly preferably 10% or higher, and most preferably 11% or higher.

On the other hand, if the content of Li₂O is too high, the crystal growth rate at the time of glass shaping becomes so high as to worsen the problem of production yield reduction due to devitrification defects. The content of Li₂O is preferably 35% or lower, more preferably 25% or lower, further more preferably 15% or lower, and particularly preferably 12% or lower.

Whereas Na₂O and K₂O are not essential components, they are components for increasing the glass meltability and lowering the glass crystal growth rate. To enhance the ion exchange performance, it is preferable that they be contained at 2% or higher in total. Their total content of Na₂O and K₂O is preferably 10% or lower, more preferably 9% or lower, further more preferably 8% or lower, even further more preferably 7% or lower, and particularly preferably 5% or lower.

Na₂O is a component for forming a surface compressive layer in chemically strengthening treatment that uses a potassium salt as well as a component for increasing the glass meltability. To have it exhibit these effects, the content of Na₂O is preferably 1% or higher, more preferably 2% or higher, further more preferably 3% or higher, and particularly preferably 4% or higher. On the other hand, from the viewpoints of preventing reduction of surface compressive stress (CS₀) in strengthening treatment using a sodium salt and realizing a profile having a large CS₉₀ value, the content of Na₂O is preferably 8% or lower, more preferably 7% or lower, further more preferably 6% or lower, and particularly preferably 5% or lower.

K₂O may be contained to, for example, enhance the ion exchange performance. In the case where K₂O is contained, the content of K₂O is preferably 0.1% or higher, more preferably 0.15% or higher, and particularly preferably 0.2% or higher. To prevent devitrification more surely, the content of K₂O is preferably 0.5% or higher and more preferably 1.2% or higher. On the other hand, a high content of K is a factor in brittleness and reduction of surface layer stress due to reverse exchange at the time of strengthening. Thus, the content of K₂O is preferably 5% or lower and more preferably 3% or lower.

The balance of Li₂O, Na₂O, and K₂O influences the ion exchange performance. In the value obtained by dividing the proportion of K₂O in a composition by a ratio of Na₂O content to a Li₂O content, that is, K₂O/(Na₂O/Li₂O), if the value is preferably 0.8 or larger, more preferably 1 or larger, further more preferably 1.5 or larger, and even further more preferably 2 or larger, the content of sodium ions in a glass surface layer can be lowered sufficiently while CS₉₀ is kept large when the glass for chemical strengthening is immersed in the second molten salt composition having potassium nitrate as a base component and containing a small amount of lithium ions in second ion exchange.

Furthermore, if the value of K₂O/(Na₂O/Li₂O) is, for example, 3 or larger, the sodium ions in a glass surface layer can be decreased more easily in the second ion exchange, making it easier to increase deep layer stress and form a stress profile having an inflection point in a deep layer. A stress profile having an inflection point in a deep layer is preferable from the viewpoints of making the tensile stress variation in a deep layer and the expansion ratio variation smaller when plural pieces of glass are processed cumulatively using the same molten salt composition.

On the other hand, if the value of K₂O/(Na₂O/Li₂O) is, for example, 3 or smaller, the of sodium ions in a glass surface layer can be reduced properly in the second ion exchange and a close-to-straight stress profile having no inflection point can be formed easily. Having no local stress reduction, a close-to-straight stress profile can prevent development of cracks generated from a glass surface layer and hence is preferable.

MgO may be contained to, for example, lower the viscosity during melting. The content of MgO is preferably 1% or higher, more preferably 2% or higher, and further more preferably 3% or higher. On the other hand, if the MgO content is too high, it becomes difficult to form a thick compressive stress layer at the time of chemically strengthening treatment. The content of MgO is preferably 15% or lower, even more preferably 10% or lower, further more preferably 8% or lower, and particularly preferably 6% or lower.

ZrO₂ may not be contained. However, from the viewpoint of increasing the surface compressive stress of chemically strengthened glass, it is preferable that ZrO₂ be contained. The content of ZrO₂ is preferably 0.1% or higher, more preferably 0.15% or higher, further more preferably 0.2% or higher, and particularly preferably 0.25% or higher. Typically, the ZrO₂ content is 0.3% or higher. On the other hand, if the content of ZrO₂ is too high, devitrification defects are prone to occur and it becomes difficult to increase the compressive stress value at the time of chemically strengthening treatment. The ZrO₂ content is preferably 2% or lower, more preferably 1.5% or lower, further more preferably 1% or lower, and particularly preferably 0.8% or lower.

The content of Y₂O₃ is preferably 0.1% or higher, more preferably 0.2% or higher, further more preferably 0.5% or higher, and particularly preferably 1% or higher. On the other hand, if the content of Y₂O₃ is too high, it becomes difficult to form a thick compressive stress layer at the time of chemically strengthening treatment. The Y₂O₃ content is preferably 5% or lower, more preferably 3% or lower, further more preferably 2% or lower, and particularly preferably 1.5% or lower.

The lithium-containing glass to be subjected to the chemical strengthening according to the present invention has the composition as described above. Glass materials are mixed as appropriate so as to obtain glass having the above-described composition and are heat-melted in a glass melting furnace. Resulting molten glass is homogenized by bubbling, stirring, addition of a refining agent, etc., shaped into a glass sheet having a prescribed thickness, and annealed. Alternatively, the resulting molten glass may be shaped into glass sheets by forming it into a block shape, annealing the glass block, and cutting it.

Examples of method of shaping into a sheet shape includes a float method, a press method, a fusion method, and a down draw method. In particular, to manufacture a large glass sheet, employment of the float method is preferable. Continuous shaping methods other than the float method, such as the fusion method and the down draw method, are also preferable.

The lithium-containing glass may be crystallized glass. Preferable crystallized glass is crystallized glass containing at least one kind of crystal selected from the group consisting of a lithium silicate crystal, a lithium aluminosilicate crystal, and a lithium phosphate crystal. The lithium silicate crystal is preferably a lithium metasilicate crystal, a lithium disilicate crystal, or the like. The lithium phosphate crystal is preferably a lithium orthophosphate crystal or the like. The lithium aluminosilicate crystal is preferably a β-spodumene crystal, a petalite crystal, or the like.

To increase the mechanical strength, the crystallization ratio of crystallized glass is preferably 10% or larger, more preferably 15% or larger, further more preferably 20% or larger, and particularly preferably 25% or larger. To increase the transparency, the crystallization ratio of crystallized glass is preferably 70% or smaller, more preferably 60% or smaller, and particularly preferably 50% or smaller. Crystallized glass being small in crystallization ratio is superior in being shaped easily by bend shaping with heating. A crystallization ratio can be calculated by the Rietveld method from X-ray diffraction intensity. The Rietveld method is described in “Crystal Analysis Handbook”, edited by the Crystal Analysis Handbook edition committee of The Crystallographic Society of Japan, Kyoritsu Shuppan Co., Ltd., 1999, pp. 492-499.

To increase the transparency, the average particle diameter of precipitated crystals of crystallized glass is preferably 300 nm or smaller, more preferably 200 nm or smaller, further more preferably 150 nm or smaller, and particularly preferably 100 nm or smaller. An average particle diameter of precipitated crystals can be determined from a transmission electron microscope (TEM) image and can be estimated from a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image.

EXAMPLES

Although the present invention will be described below using Examples, it is not restricted to those Examples.

Glass materials were mixed so as to have the following composition as represented by mol % based on oxides and subjected to weighing so that glass of 400 g will be manufactured. The mixed materials were put into a platinum crucible and melted in an electric furnace at 1,500° C. to 1,700° C. for about 3 hours, defoamed, and homogenized. In Examples 1 to 7 and 10-16, the glass composition was as follows: SiO₂: 68.9%, Al₂O₃: 12.4%, Y₂O₃: 1.3%, ZrO₂: 0.3%, Li₂O: 10.8%, Na₂O: 4.8%; K₂O: 1.2%, and the other components: 0.3%. In Examples 8 and 9, the glass composition was as follows: SiO₂: 63%, Al₂O₃: 19%, Li₂O: 13%, Na₂O: 3%, and K₂O: 2%.

The molten glass thus obtained was put into a metal die, held at a temperature that is about 50° C. higher than a glass transition temperature for 1 hour, and then cooled to room temperature at a rate of 0.5° C./min, whereby a glass block was obtained. After the glass block was cut and ground, both surfaces of each of resulting glass sheet were finally mirror-polished, whereby glass sheets having a thickness 0.7 mm or 0.65 mm were obtained.

The thus-obtained glass sheets were subjected to chemically strengthening treatment shown in Tables 1 and 2, whereby chemically strengthened glass of each of Examples 1 to 16 were manufactured. Each of glass sheets was subjected to chemical strengthening treatment by immersing it in a first molten salt composition shown in a row “first ion exchange” of Table 1 or 2 and holding it at a temperature shown in a row “temperature” of “first ion exchange” for a time shown in a row “time” of “first ion exchange.” After that, chemically strengthened glass was manufactured by immersing each resulting glass sheet in a second molten salt composition shown in a row “second ion exchange” of Table 1 or 2 and holding it at a temperature shown in a row “temperature” of “second ion exchange” for a time shown in a row “time” of “second ion exchange.”

Results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Examples 1-10 are Inventive Examples and Examples 11-16 are Comparative Examples. In Table 1, the content of each of additives in a second molten salt composition is represented ratio to a total amount when the total amount of the second molten salt composition excluding the additives is regarded as 100%.

Each kind of chemically strengthened glass was evaluated by the following methods.

[Stress Measurement Using Scattered Light Photoelastic Stress Meter]

Stress of chemically strengthened glass was measured by the method described in WO 2018/056121 using a scattered light photoelastic stress meter (SLP-1000 produced by Orihara Industrial Co., Ltd.). Stress was measured using software SlpIV (ver. 2019.01.10.001) attached to the scattered light photoelastic stress meter (SLP-1000 produced by Orihara Industrial Co., Ltd.). Stress values CS₀ and CS₉₀, maximum tensile stress values CT₁ and CT₂, a compressive stress layer depth DOL, and a value of first-order derivative value CS_(x)′ and a value of second-order derivative value CS_(x)″ of compressive stress were calculated by the above method from obtained stress profile.

A function σ(x)=a₁×erfc(a₂×x)+a₃×erfc(a₄×x)+a₅ was used for calculating a stress profile, where a_(i) (i=1 to 5) is fitting parameters and erfc is a complementary error function. The complementary error function erfc is defined by the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} \begin{matrix} {{{erfc}(x)} = {1 - {{erf}(x)}}} \\ {= {\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}{\int_{x}^{\infty}{e^{- t^{2}}{dt}}}}} \\ {= {e^{- x^{2}}{erfc}{x(x)}}} \end{matrix} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}1} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In the evaluation employed in the present specification, the fitting parameter was optimized by minimizing a residual sum of squares of raw data obtained and the above function. Individual items were set by designation or selection in the following manner: measurement processing condition was single shot; measurement region processing adjustment item was surface and edge method; internal surface edge was 6.0 μm; internal left-right edge was automatic; internal deep portion edge was automatic (center of sample film thickness); and elongation of phase curve to center of sample thickness was fitting curve.

At the same time, distributions of the concentrations of alkali metal ions (sodium ions and potassium ions) in a direction of cross section were measured using an electron probe micro analyzer (EPMA). It was confirmed that there were no discrepancies between the stress profile obtained above and a result of this measurement.

[Stress Measurement Using Glass Surface Stress Meter]

Stress was measured by a nondestructive measuring method based on the optical waveguiding effect and the photoelastic effect using a film stress measurement meter (“FSM-6000” produced by Orihara Industrial Co., Ltd.). A result of this stress measurement was combined with a result of a stress measurement using the above-mentioned scattered light photoelastic stress meter using software “PMC” of Orihara Industrial Co., Ltd.

Results are shown in Tables 1 and 2 and FIG. 3A to FIG. 7F. FIGS. 3A-3P show profiles of stress values CS_(x) of Examples 1-16 that were measured by an SLP, FIGS. 4A-4P show the absolute values of first-order derivatives CS_(x)′ of Examples 1-16, and FIGS. 5A-5P show second-order derivatives CS_(x)″ of Examples 1-16. FIGS. 7A-7F show graphs of stress profiles, each of which was obtained by combining stress measured by the SLP and stress measured by an FSM, of Examples 3-6, 8, and 9. FIGS. 7A, 7C, and 7E show entire combined stress profiles and FIGS. 7B, 7D, and 7F are enlarged graphs of parts, from the surface to a depth 10 μm, of the combined stress profiles shown in FIGS. 7A, 7C, and 7E, respectively.

[Drop Strength Test]

A drop strength test was performed in the following manner. Each of glass samples of Examples 6 and 15 having 120 mm×60 mm×0.7 mm t (thickness) was fitted into a structural body whose size, mass and stiffness were adjusted to those of common, currently used smartphones to simulate a smartphone, and a resulting sample structure was freely fallen onto an SiC sandpaper of #80. If the sample structure was not broken when it was dropped from a height of 5 cm, it was dropped again from a height that was 5 cm higher than the preceding height. This act was repeated until the sample structure was broken and a height at which the sample structure was broken for the first time was a break height. FIG. 6 is a box-and-whisker plot showing results of drop strength tests in which 19 sample structures were subjected to the drop strength test for each Example. As shown in FIG. 6, fall heights of Example 6 in which CS₉₀ was large were higher than those of Example 16.

[Number-of-Fragments Test]

A fracturing test was performed in which a diamond indenter having a tip angle of 90° was driven into a 50 mm×50 mm square chemically strengthened glass sample. If the glass sample was not broken, tests were repeated while the load imposed on the indenter was increased gradually and the number of fragments with load, which is a weakest load when breaking was occurred, was counted as number of fragments. If the number of fragments is larger than 10, it can be judged that CT exceeded a CT.

TABLE 1 Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 Glass material composition A A A A A First ion First molten salt NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ exchange composition (mass %) 100 100 100 100 100 Temperature (° C.) 420 420 420 420 420 Time (min) 75 75 110 110 110 Second ion Second molten salt KNO₃ 99.1 KNO3 99.7 KNO₃ 99.25 KNO₃ 99.5 KNO₃ 99.5 exchange composition (mass %) NaNO₃ 0.6 LiNO₃ 0.3 LiNO₃ 0.75 LiNO₃ 0.5 LiNO₃ 0.5 LiNO₃ 0.3 Additives (mass % with — — — — K₂CO₃ 0.5 respect to total amount of Silica gel 0.5 second molten salt composition) Temperature (° C.) 400 400 400 400 400 Time (min) 60 60 80 100 100 SLP Thickness t (mm) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 profile Maximum value of CS_(x)″ 0.0151 0.0142 0.0065 0.0068 0.0088 Minimum value of CS_(x)″ 0.0011 0.0019 0.0005 0.0005 0.0006 Maximum value of CS_(x)′ −1.0441 −0.9926 −0.9323 −0.9482 −1.0857 Minimum value of CS_(x)′ −2.5455 −2.5857 −1.5024 −1.5479 −1.8805 19.5/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 85 84 92 91 90 15/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 65 65 71 70 69 CS₀ (MPa) 245 235 176 178 212 CT₂ (MPa) 75 73 77 80 85 CS₉₀ (MPa) 45 43 51 49 56 CS₉₀/{CT₂ × (t − 2 × 1.86 1.82 2.21 2.06 2.19 DOL/1,000)}/t (/mm²) DOL (μm) 121 119 138 135 134 CT₂/CT₁ 0.96 0.94 0.82 0.84 0.90 SLP/FSM CS₀ (MPa) — — — 793 913 combined CS₉₀ (MPa) — — — 49 56 profile CT₂ (MPa) — — — 80 85 DOL (μm) — — — 136 135 Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 Ex. 9 Ex. 10 Glass material composition A A A A A First ion First molten salt NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ 98.4 exchange composition (mass %) 100 100 100 100 LiNO₃ 1.6 Temperature (° C.) 420 420 400 400 420 Time (min) 110 75 80 80 105 Second ion Second molten salt KNO3 99 KNO₃ 99.7 KNO₃ 99 KNO₃ 99 KNO₃ 99.5 exchange composition (mass %) LiNO₃1 LiNO3 0.3 LiNO₃ 1 LiNO₃ 1 NaNO₃ 0.3 LiNO₃ 0.2 Additives (mass % with K₂CO₃ 0.5 — K₂CO₃ 0.5 — — respect to total amount of Silica gel 0.5 Silica gel 0.5 second molten salt composition) Temperature (° C.) 400 400 420 420 400 Time (min) 100 60 60 60 70 SLP Thickness t (mm) 0.7 0.65 0.7 0.7 0.7 profile Maximum value of CS_(x)″ 0.0049 0.0105 0.0100 0.0087 −0.0099 Minimum value of CS_(x)″ 0.0004 0.0008 −0.0052 −0.0135 −1.7475 Maximum value of CS_(x)′ −0.8803 −1.0029 −1.2870 −0.5323 0.3739 Minimum value of CS_(x)′ −1.2926 −2.0198 −1.5783 −1.4355 0.00002 19.5/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 94 96 90 91 88 15/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 73 74 69 70 68 CS₀ (MPa) 161 204 195 147 183 CT₂ (MPa) 79 83 85 78 78 CS₉₀ (MPa) 52 41 66 65 47 CS₉₀/{CT₂ × (t − 2 × 2.27 1.89 2.56 2.77 1.96 DOL/1,000)}/t (/mm²) DOL (μm) 144 122 134 136 128 CT₂/CT₁ 0.83 0.94 0.77 0.71 0.935 SLP/FSM CS₀ (MPa) 783 — 866 811 — combined CS₉₀ (MPa) 52 — 60 53 — profile CT₂ (MPa) 79 — 86 80 — DOL (μm) 145 — 137 139 —

TABLE 2 Ex. 11 Ex. 12 Ex. 13 Ex. 14 Ex. 15 Ex. 16 Glass material composition A A A A A A First ion First molten salt NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ exchange composition (mass %) 100 100 100 100 100 100 Temperature (° C.) 420 380 420 380 380 380 Time (min) 75 150 75 150 90 120 Second ion Second molten salt KNO₃ 99.7 KNO₃ KNO₃ 99.7 KNO₃ KNO₃ KNO₃ 99 exchange composition (mass %) NaNO₃ 0.3 100 NaNO₃ 0.3 100 100 NaNO₃ 1 Additives (mass % with — — — — — — respect to total amount of second molten salt composition) Temperature (° C.) 400 400 400 400 400 440 Time (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 SLP Thickness t (mm) 0.65 0.65 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 profile Maximum value of CS_(x)″ 0.2590 0.2335 0.3105 0.1543 0.2656 0.2254 Minimum value of CS_(x)″ 0.0094 0.0117 0.0157 0.0165 0.0141 0.0078 Maximum value of CS_(x)′ −1.1373 −1.0207 −1.1454 −1.0314 −0.7253 −0.8809 Minimum value of CS_(x)′ −7.3666 −9.0498 −11.1783 −6.9512 −7.9772 −8.4140 19.5/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 93 92 83 81 78 84 15/(t/2 − DOL/1000) 72 71 64 63 60 65 CS₀ (MPa) 308 376 442 352 316 325 CT₂ (MPa) 95 87 85 78 61 77 CS₉₀ (MPa) 39 34 39 34 16 32 CS₉₀/{CT₂ × (t − 2 × 1.53 1.41 1.40 1.31 0.77 1.26 DOL/1,000)}/t (/mm²) DOL (μm) 116 114 115 111 102 118 CT₂/CT₁ 1.07 1.23 1.09 1.10 SLP/FSM CS₀ (MPa) — — — — combined CS₉₀ (MPa) — — — — profile CT₂ (MPa) — — — — DOL (μm) — — — —

As seen from Tables 1 and 2, in Examples 1-10 which are Inventive Examples, CS_(x)′ was −4.7 or larger, as a result of which CS₉₀ was made larger than in Comparative Examples and the drop strength was increased.

CT₁ and DOL after the first ion exchange were 78 MPa and 94 am in Examples 1, 2, and 13, 95 MPa and 105 μm in Examples 3-6, 88 MPa and 100 μm in Examples 7 and 11, and 71 MPa and 86 μm in Examples 12 and 14. CT₁ was 110 MPa in Examples 8 and 9.

In Examples 1-10, the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ were introduced by the first ion exchange so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₁ became 19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) or larger, that is, CT₁ at this time exceeded the CT limit value. On the other hand, through the second ion exchange the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ became smaller than 19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000), that is, CT₂ after the second ion exchange was smaller than the CT limit value. As shown in Table 1, the ratio of CT₂ after the second ion exchange to CT₁ after the first ion exchange (in Table 1, item CT₂/CT₁) was 0.99 or smaller. That is, in Examples 1-10, sufficiently large compressive stress was introduced by the first ion exchange and the total amount of compressive stress was reduced while CS₉₀ was kept large by the second ion exchange, whereby the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ was made smaller than the CT limit. Furthermore, in Examples 5, 6, and 8, it is seen that by adding silica gel and potassium carbonate in the second molten salt composition, “Na—K exchange” was accelerated and CS₀ was increased in the SLP/FSM combined profile.

On the other hand, in Examples 11-16 which are Comparative Examples, lithium nitrate was not added to the second molten salt composition at the second ion exchange, and the value of CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t was smaller than in Inventive Examples. Furthermore, in Examples 11 and 13, the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ after the second ion exchange was larger than 19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000), that is, exceeded the CT limit. This means that breaking may occur explosively to make the number of fragments very large. On the other hand, in Examples 12 and 14, CS₉₀ was small because the CT₁ value after the first ion exchange was made small so that the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ after the second ion exchange became the CT limit or smaller.

Table 3 shows Inventive Examples 17-19 and Comparative Example 20 in each which chemically strengthened glass was manufactured that had a base composition containing SiO₂ of 40 to 75%, Al₂O₃ of 10 to 20% and Li₂O of 5 to 35% as represented by mol % based on oxides. The chemically strengthened glass of each of Inventive Examples 17-19 satisfied CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t≥2.00. In Comparative Example 20, CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t had a small value.

TABLE 3 Example 17 Example 18 Example 19 Example 20 First ion First molten salt NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ NaNO₃ exchange composition (mass %) 100 100 100 100 Temperature (° C.) 390 390 390 390 Time (min) 360 310 280 180 Second ion Second molten salt KNO₃ 99.5 KNO₃ 99.5 KNO₃ 99.5 KNO₃ 100 exchange composition (mass %) NaNO₃ 0.5 NaNO₃ 0.5 NaNO₃ 0.5 Additives (mass % with — — — — respect to total amount of second molten salt composition) Temperature (° C.) 410 410 410 410 Time (min) 60 60 60 60 SLP profile Thickness t (mm) 0.7 0.65 0.65 0.7 CT₂ (MPa) 107 112 103 98 CS₉₀ (MPa) no 100 80 49 CS₉₀{CT₂ × (t − 2 × 3.23 3.43 2.86 1.45 DOL/1,000)}/t (/mm²) DOL (μm) 123 125 116 104 CT₂/CT₁ 0.71 0.75 0.80 1.21

In Inventive Examples 17-19, the ratio of CT₂ after the second ion exchange to CT₁ after the first ion exchange (in Table 3, item CT₂/CT₁) was 0.99 or smaller. In Inventive Examples 17-19, CT₁ was larger than that in Comparative Example 20, sufficiently large compressive stress was introduced by the first ion exchange and the total amount of compressive stress was reduced while CS₉₀ was kept large by the second ion exchange, whereby the maximum tensile stress value CT₂ was made smaller than the CT limit.

The present application is based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2021-030726 filed on Feb. 26, 2022, and the contents thereof are incorporated herein by reference. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A chemically strengthened glass having a thickness t (mm), wherein a first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of a stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is −4.7 or larger in a range of CS_(x)≥0 in a profile of the stress value CS_(x) (MPa), wherein the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is a function of depth×(μm) from a glass surface, and wherein the stress value CS_(x) (MPa) is measured by a scattered light photoelastic stress meter.
 2. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein in the profile of the stress value CS_(x), a second-order derivative CS_(x)″ of the stress value CS_(x) satisfies CS_(x)″≤0.050.
 3. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein a second-order derivative CS_(x)″ of the stress value CS_(x) is larger than
 0. 4. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein the first-order derivative CS_(x)′ of the stress value CS_(x) is 0 or smaller.
 5. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein in the profile of the stress value CS_(x) (MPa), a stress value CS₀ at a glass outermost surface is 300 MPa or smaller.
 6. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein a maximum tensile stress CT₂ (MPa) satisfies the following inequality: CT₂≤19.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) where t (mm) is the thickness and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth.
 7. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein a maximum stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 (μm) from a glass surface satisfies the following inequality: CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t≥1.62 where t (mm) is the thickness, CT₂ (MPa) is a tensile stress and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth.
 8. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein: the chemically strengthened glass is a chemically strengthened glass obtained by a chemical strengthening of two or more steps; and a maximum tensile stress CT₂ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass is 50% to 99% of a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of a chemically strengthened glass obtained after a first-stage chemical strengthening of the chemical strengthening of two or more steps.
 9. The chemically strengthened glass according to claim 1, wherein a base composition of the chemically strengthened glass comprises, as represented by mol % based on oxides, SiO₂ of 52% to 75%; Al₂O₃ of 8% to 20%; Li₂O of 5% to 16%; and Na₂O of 8% or smaller.
 10. A manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method comprising: performing a first ion exchange by immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition containing sodium ions; and performing a second ion exchange by immersing the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange in a second molten salt composition containing potassium ions and lithium ions, wherein: a concentration of a sodium nitrate in the first molten salt composition is higher than 50 mass %; and in the second molten salt composition a concentration of a potassium nitrate is 85 mass % or higher and a ratio of a mass of sodium ions to a mass of lithium ions represented by a mass ratio of (sodium ions)/(lithium ions) is 0 or larger and 15 or smaller.
 11. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the second molten salt composition contains a sodium nitrate of higher than 0 mass % and 5 mass % or lower.
 12. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the second molten salt composition contains a lithium nitrate of 0.1 mass % or higher and 10 mass % or lower.
 13. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein in the first ion exchange the first molten salt composition has a temperature of 360° C. or higher and 450° C. or lower.
 14. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 13, wherein in the first ion exchange the lithium-containing glass is immersed in the first molten salt composition for 0.5 hour or longer and 12 hours or shorter.
 15. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein in the second ion exchange the second molten salt composition has a temperature of 360° C. or higher and 450° C. or lower.
 16. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 15, wherein in the second ion exchange the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange is immersed in the second molten salt composition for an immersion time t2 (min) that satisfies the following inequality: −0.38 T+173<t2<−1.4 T+720 where T (° C.) is the temperature of the second molten salt composition.
 17. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the lithium-containing glass is chemically strengthened so that a maximum tensile stress CT₂ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the second ion exchange becomes 50% to 99% of a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange.
 18. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange satisfies the following inequality: CT₁>17.5/(t/2−DOL/1,000) where t is a thickness of the chemically strengthened glass and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth.
 19. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the lithium-containing glass comprises, as represented by mol % based on oxides, SiO₂ of 52% to 75%; Al₂O₃ of 8% to 20%; Li₂O of 5% to 16%; and Na₂O of 8% or smaller.
 20. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the second molten salt composition contains a silicic acid.
 21. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 10, wherein the second molten salt composition contains a carbonate.
 22. A manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method comprising: performing a first ion exchange by immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition containing sodium ions; and performing a second ion exchange by immersing the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange in a second molten salt composition containing potassium ions and lithium ions, wherein: the lithium-containing glass is chemically strengthened so that a maximum tensile stress CT₂ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the second ion exchange becomes 50% to 99% of a maximum tensile stress CT₁ (MPa) of the chemically strengthened glass obtained after the first ion exchange.
 23. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 22, wherein: a concentration of a sodium nitrate in the first molten salt composition is higher than 50 mass %; and a concentration of a potassium nitrate in the second molten salt composition is 85 mass % or higher.
 24. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 22, wherein a second molten salt composition contains a sodium nitrate of higher than 0 mass % and 5 mass % or lower.
 25. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 22, wherein the second molten salt composition contains a lithium nitrate of 0.1 mass % or higher and 10 mass % or lower.
 26. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 22, wherein in the first ion exchange the first molten salt composition has a temperature of 360° C. or higher and 450° C. or lower.
 27. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 26, wherein in the first ion exchange the lithium-containing glass is immersed in the first molten salt composition for 0.5 hour or longer and 12 hours or shorter.
 28. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 22, wherein in the second ion exchange the second molten salt composition has a temperature of 360° C. or higher and 450° C. or lower.
 29. The manufacturing method of a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 28, wherein in the second ion exchange the lithium-containing glass obtained after the first ion exchange is immersed in the second molten salt composition for an immersion time t2 (min) that satisfies the following inequality: −0.38 T+173<t2<−1.4 T+720 where T (° C.) is the temperature of the second molten salt composition.
 30. A manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass, the method comprising: a first step of immersing a lithium-containing glass in a first molten salt composition; and a second step of immersing the lithium-containing glass in a second molten salt composition that is different in composition from the first molten salt composition, wherein: an ion exchange for giving a stress that is larger than a CT limit to the lithium-containing glass is performed in the first step; and a step of reducing the stress to a value lower than the CT limit is executed in the second step.
 31. The manufacturing method for a chemically strengthened glass according to claim 30, wherein: the first molten salt composition contains lithium ions; and the second molten salt composition contains potassium ions and lithium ions.
 32. A chemically strengthened glass, wherein: a base composition comprises, as represented by mol % based on oxides, SiO₂ of 40% to 75%; Al₂O₃ of 1% to 20%; and Li₂O of 5% to 35%; and wherein a stress value CS₉₀ at a depth 90 (μm) from a glass surface satisfies the following inequality: CS₉₀/{CT₂×(t−2×DOL/1,000)}/t≥2.00 where t (mm) is a thickness of the chemically strengthened glass, CT₂ (MPa) is maximum tensile stress and DOL (μm) is a compressive stress layer depth. 